At the recent SAMS meeting and symposium in Halifax there was one session on oil sampling and what an oil sample could tell you. This was interesting to me as one of the things that I often get asked for when I do a survey is to take an oil sample. The trouble with oil samples is that there are so many variables; if the oil has just been put in the engine before the winter layup as it should be then all that an oil analysis is going to tell me is that the oil is new. If on the other hand the oil has been in the engine for several years and not been regularly changed then it will often show high levels of sulphur, water and other contaminates which is not necessarily the fault of the engine but more the fault of the owner who has not changed the oil as often as he or she should have. Then there are so many different formulations of oil that unless you know what was used in the engine you have no base line to work from.
Oil samples can be useful and to my mind the best method seems to be to test some fresh oil of the type used in the engine and get the raw data from that, then with fresh oil and filters on the engine test the oil after say 25 hours of running then compare these results with the base sample. If high levels of particulate are present then these will be spotted and it may provide an early warning that all is not well with the engine. If samples are taken at similar intervals each season and records kept then a fairly reliable and accurate picture can be drawn up over a number of years of the health of the engine. If samples are just taken willy nilly at no known hours since the last oil change then the results are pretty meaningless as oil that has been in the engine for one week and has ten hours on it will give completely different results to a sample that is taken at 250 hours the following year.



Recent Comments